TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 20:57
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 67.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 999
92% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 84.2%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 159
Parallax 158
131% 159 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 360 311 202 229 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 410
Write 455
Mixed 370
SusWrite 277
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 35.5
127% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 331
248% 330 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 99%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
193GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 417 433 453 459 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 459
Mixed 407
SusWrite 428
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 45.7
155% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 291
240% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
4TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 160 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 128
Write 132
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 160
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 82.8%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 24.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 66.5%
 Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 144 27" 2560 1369 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples2,576x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples2,073x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples1,090x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples996x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples742x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples723x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples725x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples537x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples480x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples428x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples268x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples258x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $972
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback