TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 960XGL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive407% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960XGL  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XGL-XG1BR
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 19:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 53.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 331
97% 189 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,169
108% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,972
122% 1,972 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D8) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 74.6
33% 48.3 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 0.2
14% 18.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TB
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7GK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2684 3125 3225 2676 1622 1617 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
407% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 3,088
Mixed 2,984
SusWrite 2,492
632% 2,795 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 102
325% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 1,068
802% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑
This bench: 407%
 Great: 447%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 66
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 75.5
187% 65.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 30.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 99% ↑
This bench: 164%
 Great: 165%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 22 214 57 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4188
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 960XGL Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Samsung 960XGL

CPU
Core Ultra 9 185HIntelBench 95%, 153 samples14x
Core Ultra 7 155HIntelBench 89%, 159 samples3x
GPU
Arc GraphicsIntelBench 24%, 842 samples12x
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples4x
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples1x
SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TBSamsungBench 359%, 283 samples14x
SDCQNRZ-2T00-1004 2TBSn810Bench 507%, 4 samples2x
SDCQNRY-1T00-1004 1TBSn810Bench 504%, 1 sample1x
RAM
K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 8x4GBSamsungBench 139%, 580 samples14x
K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GBSamsungBench 137%, 912 samples2x
K3KLALA0CM-MGCT 8x8GBSamsungBench 133%, 79 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback