Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics232% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 192
2-Core 382
118% 223 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,265
120% 995 Pts
64-Core 1,725
107% 1,725 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$595
Gigabyte(1458 413B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Lighting 330
Reflection 329
Parallax 351
269% 337 fps
MRender 483
Gravity 278
Splatting 222
255% 328 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 232%
Great: 235%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPP002T 2TB
971GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10932
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,931
Write 4,032
Mixed 2,676
721% 3,213 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 79.8
311% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,738
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,180
949% 1350 MB/s
Poor: 353% Great: 593%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
195% Outstanding
MC Read 79.4
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 70.9
206% 72.1 GB/s
SC Read 53.4
SC Write 60.1
SC Mixed 58.6
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 195%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 29.5" 1280 720 SPT0C0D C305W-2560UN
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,030
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback