Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 19:36
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 101
45% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 9.5
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 330 289 279 253 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 431
Write 402
Mixed 345
SusWrite 281
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 37.9
133% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 138
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 134%
Ct2000bx 50 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 209 16 15 15 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 126
Write 82
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 112
22% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 9.3
52% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 14.1
28% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
168GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 141 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 140
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 194 195 199 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 168
Mixed 126
SusWrite 194
118% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 50 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A20 24MP55
Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback