Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 days ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 264
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1,030
94% 788 Pts
64-Core 2,142
133% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 270
Parallax 202
189% 235 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 158
Splatting 129
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 349 353 349 344 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,475
Write 454
Mixed 1,286
SusWrite 415
253% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 86.1
286% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,082
815% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 263%
Great: 372%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
162GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 116 113 113 107 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 478
Write 323
Mixed 363
SusWrite 143
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 41.3
150% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 167
128% 174 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
250GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 89.8
Write 92.9
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 83.8
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 7 144 24" 1920 1057 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback