Lenovo 20287

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20287  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO VIUU4
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 16:44
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 39.1
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 107
36% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 166
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 136
Write 144
Mixed 139
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 10.7
38% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 162
123% 163 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 136%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
71GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 187
Write 173
Mixed 148
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.9
16% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 48
46% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 4GB
4GB free, PID 0177
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.6
Write 5.7
Mixed 3.2
8% 8.17 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 494
8% 494 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 12 64 0" 1280 720
Typical 20287 Builds (Compare 792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20287

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $91
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback