MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 13:05
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 663
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
86% 106 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 204 63 60 61 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 472
Mixed 396
SusWrite 145
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 51
168% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
658GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 447 459 452 464 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 473
Mixed 448
SusWrite 453
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 55.4
179% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
458GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 135 135 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 193
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 134
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
General UDisk 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 22
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.1
7% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.8% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 189 11 144 27" 1920 1017 SAM0E41 C27FG7x
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback