Skikk Idavoll II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive514% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 days ago, 15 days ago.
SystemSkikk Idavoll II  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Idavoll II
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 13:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 165
2-Core 292
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 427
59% 436 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 8885) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 13.9
9% 14.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 15
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX700-02T-80 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN15299
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2649 3125 2528 3296 4128 4151 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,488
Write 1,384
Mixed 2,852
SusWrite 3,313
618% 2,759 MB/s
4K Read 77.1
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 112
382% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,452
DQ Write 971
DQ Mixed 1,092
847% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 298%
This bench: 514%
Great: 611%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK32S432G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 35.4
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 27
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1775
Typical Idavoll II Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Skikk Idavoll II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback