Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 12:00
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 217
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 808
75% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 134
107% 136 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 140
Splatting 118
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 67 156 50 53 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 52.2
Write 256
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 89.5
24% 104 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 29.7
78% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 167
156% 239 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 91%
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
398GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 775 792 805 805 816 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,449
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,350
SusWrite 914
300% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 61.4
215% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 712
530% 703 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 211%
Great: 269%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 88.7
Mixed 62
SusWrite 93
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 163 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 132
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 160
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX8GD3200C16W4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 32.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback