Asus ROG STRIX B660-I GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive440% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 days ago, 15 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B660-I GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 11:58
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 191
2-Core 373
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,180
114% 937 Pts
64-Core 1,736
107% 1,736 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3725 2811 1256 1240 1226 1244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 3983
Write 3,743
Mixed 2,511
SusWrite 1917
680% 3,038 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 99.6
339% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,477
DQ Write 1144
DQ Mixed 1,299
975% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 440%
Great: 537%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
7GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 468
Mixed 397
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.8
162% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 339
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
163% Outstanding
MC Read 66.9
MC Write 64.8
MC Mixed 60
182% 63.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 29
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 163%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 11 144 0" 2560 1369
Typical ROG STRIX B660-I GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B660-I GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback