Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:53
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 71
2-Core 108
55% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 145
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 33.1
30% 34.9 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 23.9
25% 32 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 392 400 409 409 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 498
Write 400
Mixed 410
SusWrite 375
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 24.5
109% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 42.2
86% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.5" 1280 720 PHLC07F Philips 196VL
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback