TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 218
2-Core 422
124% 240 Pts
4-Core 829
8-Core 1,544
142% 1,186 Pts
64-Core 3149
195% 3149 Pts
Poor: 112% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 301
Parallax 316
240% 304 fps
MRender 443
Gravity 257
Splatting 200
234% 300 fps
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 211%
 Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 1990 2028 2127 2098 2104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,202
Write 2,081
Mixed 2192
SusWrite 2,023
479% 2,125 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 67.4
218% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 846
601% 788 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑
This bench: 313%
 Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 76.2
MC Write 68.6
MC Mixed 68.3
203% 71 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 28.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 114% ↑
This bench: 180%
 Great: 179%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 11% 9 200 24 60 16" 1536 937 BOE0B90
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

CPU
Core i9-13950HXIntelBench 116%, 1,063 samples168x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples49x
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples49x
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples40x
SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples97x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples24x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples13x
RAM
HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,113 samples51x
M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 149%, 2,547 samples39x
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 152%, 5,144 samples23x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback