Acer AO722

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AO722  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE10-BZ
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:31
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 44.9
1-Core 7
2-Core 11.7
18% 21.2 Pts
4-Core 13.3
8-Core 14.1
2% 13.7 Pts
64-Core 13.5
1% 13.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Acer(1025 0598) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 128GB 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R6310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 81 74 75 86 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.5% Very poor
Read 84.1
Write 70.1
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 74.5
17% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 7.1
22% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 39.3
DQ Mixed 34.6
27% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.22% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 16 60 11.6" 1280 720 CMO1113
Typical AO722 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer AO722

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback