Asus B85M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-F  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 08:30
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 372
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 135
Parallax 117
97% 124 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 101
Splatting 97.2
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 229
Write 123
Mixed 177
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 33.4
114% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 103
79% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
216GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 200 230 230 232 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.2% Very good
Read 254
Write 200
Mixed 234
SusWrite 211
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 42.7
139% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
338GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 69 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 67.3
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 11 60 31.5" 2048 1089 PHLC15C PHL 328M6F
Typical B85M-F Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback