TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default AORUS 15P YD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGIGABYTE AORUS 15P YD
MotherboardDefault AORUS 15P YD  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210503
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 273
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 802
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 78.8%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 76D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 11
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 6.13%
 Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 76D1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 143
Parallax 120
118% 136 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 83.9
71% 86.6 fps
Poor: 96% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR01TBTLG-E6GBTNB4 1TB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 578 464 523 447 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,041
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,800
SusWrite 485
369% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 72.6
238% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 771
614% 865 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑
This bench: 226%
 Great: 398%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 29
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 17.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SHP155D LQ156M1JW03
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical AORUS 15P YD Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: Default AORUS 15P YD

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples359x
GPU
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples199x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples160x
SSD
ESR01TBTLG-E6GBTNB4 1TBBench 313%, 1,902 samples288x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples29x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples10x
RAM
AO1P32NCSV1-BDBS 2x16GBAdataBench 88%, 880 samples86x
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 86%, 11,002 samples85x
CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GBCrucialBench 84%, 443 samples60x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback