Default X670E Pro RS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 354%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 406%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics335% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault X670E Pro RS  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Pro RS
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220923
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:40
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$290
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 210
2-Core 417
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 785
8-Core 1,380
131% 1,082 Pts
64-Core 2,532
157% 2,532 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
335% Outstanding
Lighting 524
Reflection 679
Parallax 642
427% 615 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 509
Splatting 268
326% 417 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 335%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,461
Write 2,133
Mixed 48.5
270% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 8.4
96% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 54
92% 193 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 148 149 150 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 193
Write 161
Mixed 112
SusWrite 147
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 0.8
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D5U1648400B-K66 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 45.9
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 49
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 45.2
138% 48.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 134%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 3R 3G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 25% 76 216 57 120 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C5
Typical X670E Pro RS Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO

System: Default X670E Pro RS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback