Gigabyte GA-B650M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive467% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 06:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$259
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 199
2-Core 396
121% 229 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1,545
138% 1,169 Pts
64-Core 1,818
112% 1,818 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 13
6% 11 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 20.3
11% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRDK2000G 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK51.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3855 3996 3965 3987 4005 4105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
467% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 2,884
Mixed 2,688
SusWrite 3,986
662% 2,911 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 69.2
225% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,894
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,828
1,296% 1,660 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 467%
Great: 649%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5600C4616G-BLABBK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 32.4
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 47.7
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 37
114% 39.8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 105%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 17% 6 84 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-B650M DS3H Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback