Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 05:51
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 683
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 37.4
32% 36.5 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 20.8
26% 33.9 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1319 838 491 554 417 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,538
Write 1,412
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 677
272% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.4
207% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 819
585% 758 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 200%
Great: 274%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 189 186 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 160
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 187
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
475% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
892GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 165 166 166 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 106
SusWrite 165
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1Z3200C16 24GB
2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.1% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 5 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback