Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5 MR9A PRO MAX
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 05:00
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 163
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 656
59% 497 Pts
64-Core 1,351
84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 186
Parallax 181
141% 180 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 186
Splatting 125
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1590 1561 1497 121 121 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,947
Write 1,576
Mixed 1266
SusWrite 836
314% 1,406 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 32.8
131% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 524
371% 478 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 189%
Great: 352%
Kingston SV300S37A240G 253GB
19GB free
Firmware: P0316B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 249 249 245 230 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 443
Write 245
Mixed 182
SusWrite 241
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 10.2
61% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 62.9
90% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 65%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
177GB free
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 35 25 4.4 200 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 238
Write 211
Mixed 197
SusWrite 101
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 16.5
56% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 44.1
42% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback