TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 04:48
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 322
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 904
96% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 95.2%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
PowerColor(148C 2413)
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 138
Parallax 178
75% 136 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 164
126% 154 fps
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 92.6%
 Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
538GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2299 2335 2168 2250 2239 2268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,526
Write 2,473
Mixed 2,215
SusWrite 2,260
534% 2,368 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 60.8
206% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,180
874% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 249% ↑
This bench: 354%
 Great: 623%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
843GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 130 133 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 131
136% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 49.9%
 Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 46%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 IOCFFFF 27G1G
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples851x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples624x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples560x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples382x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples359x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples247x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples133x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples108x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples91x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples244x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples194x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples163x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback