TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B650M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 152%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 12 hrs ago, 12 hrs ago, 12 hrs ago, 11 hrs ago, 10 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsrock B650M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M-C
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240301
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 04:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$281
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 5.2 GHz, turbo 7.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 278
2-Core 556
158% 310 Pts
4-Core 1,109
8-Core 2,173
194% 1,641 Pts
64-Core 2,668
165% 2,668 Pts
Poor: 101% ↑
This bench: 152%
 Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
ASRock(1849 5201) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 165% Great: 178%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3666 2117 993 225 230 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,662
Write 3,773
Mixed 2,819
SusWrite 1,242
540% 2,374 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 99.1
351% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,628
DQ Write 2,107
DQ Mixed 2,362
1,770% 2,366 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑
This bench: 356%
 Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
216% Outstanding
MC Read 69.7
MC Write 85.2
MC Mixed 77.4
221% 77.4 GB/s
SC Read 67
SC Write 83.2
SC Mixed 72.4
212% 74.2 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 204%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 31.5" 1280 720 ACR067E ED323QUR A
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B650M-C Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M-C

CPU
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $234Bench 112%, 4,548 samples11x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD  $320Bench 113%, 4,545 samples5x
Ryzen 5 7600XAMD  $196Bench 110%, 6,311 samples5x
GPU
RTX 4060-TiNvidia  $385Bench 145%, 21,427 samples8x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $773Bench 240%, 46,082 samples8x
RTX 4060Nvidia  $293Bench 122%, 48,534 samples7x
SSD
LEGEND 800 GOLD 2TBAdataBench 336%, 494 samples5x
Blue SN580 2TBWDBench 499%, 1,594 samples5x
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TBBench 347%, 11,220 samples4x
RAM
UD5-6000 1x16GBUnknownBench 95%, 916 samples7x
UD5-5200 2x16GBUnknownBench 154%, 564 samples7x
UD5-6000 2x16GBUnknownBench 173%, 4,588 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback