Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Memory 18.8 1-Core 12.7 2-Core 24.2 12% 18.6 Pts	4-Core 86.2 8-Core 75.8 11% 81 Pts	64-Core 97 6% 97 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 85F5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-8D128-HP 128GB 922 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 131 127 88 145 93 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.6% Below average	Read 199 Write 268 Mixed 268 SusWrite 114 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 17.2 57% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 41.8 44% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 0.7 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 513 8% 513 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUOB79F

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	398x
Pentium 6405UIntelBench 49%, 1,392 samples	272x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	225x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	705x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 1,390 samples	272x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	214x

SSD
CVB-8D128-HP 128GBSsstcBench 64%, 922 samples	108x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	80x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	67x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 12,631 samples	135x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	79x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GBHynixBench 35%, 2,414 samples	56x