Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:39
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 124
52% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
EVGA(3842 2650) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.8
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R3C0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 256 263 168 92 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 303
Write 263
Mixed 237
SusWrite 182
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 26.5
91% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 32.2
28% 40 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
130GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 121
Write 108
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 109%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 248GB
27GB free, PID 1006
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 47 48 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 86.5
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 45.7
35% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 60 20" 1280 720 DELD010 DELL E207WFP
Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback