MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 304%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 304%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics296% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230504
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:34
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 98.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 319
106% 194 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,194
107% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,521
94% 1,521 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$930
Gainward(10B0 F299) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Lighting 442
Reflection 436
Parallax 465
360% 448 fps
MRender 557
Gravity 375
Splatting 269
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 296%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
735GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2433 2526 1465 746 755 760 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 538
Mixed 239
SusWrite 1,447
136% 589 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 3.9
48% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,132
822% 1068 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 153%
Great: 417%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 552 554 554 559 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,241
Write 643
Mixed 128
SusWrite 582
143% 649 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 38.5
123% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 116
103% 161 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 132%
Great: 277%
Adata SU630 240GB
167GB free
Firmware: S190802a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 351 345 342 341 345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 494
Write 472
Mixed 154
SusWrite 345
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 10.2
86% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 219
174% 237 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
862GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 174 173 174 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 148
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 173
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 45.5
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 33.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 44.3
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 42.7
94% 42.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 31.5" 1280 720 GBT2800 M28U
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback