Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:34
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 170
2-Core 336
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,285
116% 979 Pts
64-Core 2,637
163% 2,637 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 276
Parallax 307
245% 294 fps
MRender 334
Gravity 254
Splatting 179
200% 256 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 204%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 248 246 147 244 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,356
Write 1,389
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 263
296% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.1
239% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 589
530% 798 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 225%
Great: 383%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
438GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2354 1911 1899 1910 1888 1875 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,705
Write 3,073
Mixed 2,767
SusWrite 1,973
593% 2,629 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 80.9
258% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1031
DQ Mixed 1,170
881% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 362%
Great: 515%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-16GTZN 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 28.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 0P 5R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 34" 3440 1377 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,014
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback