Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:31
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 42.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 249
77% 147 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 947
90% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 72%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 23.2
12% 17.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 19.5
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 134 490 197 208 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1,694
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 233
285% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 63.5
204% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 286
270% 440 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 184%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SM4U660A8ADHC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 14 144 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR0852 XF243Y P
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback