Alienware Aurora R16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R16  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0RF96M
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 224
2-Core 420
124% 240 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,540
135% 1,150 Pts
64-Core 3,750
232% 3,750 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Dell(1028 5107) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 546
Parallax 646
178% 470 fps
MRender 501
Gravity 543
Splatting 292
349% 446 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 209%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 2048GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,096
Write 2,038
Mixed 2,011
458% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 59.7
200% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 792
578% 777 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AGBUA081N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 62.2
MC Write 63.6
MC Mixed 56.8
174% 60.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 154%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 19% 63 188 12 240 31.6" 2560 1417 DELA246 AW3225QF
Typical Aurora R16 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback