Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:07
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,138
109% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
XFX(1EAE 7801) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 272
Parallax 515
210% 348 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 302
Splatting 285
250% 309 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,266
Write 1,850
Mixed 1,336
334% 1,484 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50.8
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 91.7
68% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 305%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
357GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,453
Write 2,014
Mixed 2,049
484% 2,172 MB/s
4K Read 73.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 100
328% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,453
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,282
966% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
34GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 254
Write 133
Mixed 204
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 42.9
156% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 115
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
704GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 118
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
981GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.3
Write 75.9
Mixed 48.2
38% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC 126GB
115GB free, PID 1220
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86
Write 65.7
Mixed 70
92% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 5.3
336% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.3
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.2
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 4 144 34" 1280 720 DELD12C DELL S3422DWG
Typical GA-B550 UD AC-Y1 Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback