TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$109
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 280
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 800
84% 671 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 85.8%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2405) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 141
Parallax 245
99% 169 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 129
Splatting 198
153% 187 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 239
Write 136
Mixed 158
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 31.1
96% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 119
90% 118 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
900GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 76.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 82
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 45.6%
 Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
75GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 104 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63% Good
Read 116
Write 80.4
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 103
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 63%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 25.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 6% 50 207 58 144 24" 1280 720 GSM5B73 24GL600F
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples266x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $109Bench 86%, 14,368 samples205x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples181x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $253Bench 100%, 447,556 samples148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples71x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples52x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples39x
RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples56x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback