HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-k0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-k0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A4E
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 03:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 273
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 607
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8A4E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 15.2
10% 13.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 13.3
12% 15.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0TFH-1BC1AABHA 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 956 943 1671 1947 1927 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 1,318
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 1,396
354% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 71.3
224% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 478
349% 464 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 267%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 34.5
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 26
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 27 144 16" 1280 720 BOE09F1
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-k0xxx Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-k0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback