Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:45
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 315
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 964
95% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 240E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 394
Parallax 416
175% 341 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 208
Splatting 377
292% 358 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 192%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
20GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,506
Write 2,379
Mixed 2386
610% 2,757 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 85
300% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,459
DQ Write 1064
DQ Mixed 1,183
905% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 494%
AGI1T0GIMAI298 1TB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 1492 642 134 137 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,357
Mixed 925
SusWrite 668
249% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 54.5
154% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 818
578% 737 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 181%
Great: 298%
Adata SU750 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 412 408 416 416 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 413
Mixed 383
SusWrite 412
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 204 198 200 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 157
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 199
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GTZR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 39.6
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 36
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 13% 75 193 21 142 34" 1280 720 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback