Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:20
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 422
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8770) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 7
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 264 262 259 258 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,165
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 295
285% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 63.3
199% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 698
529% 721 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 200%
Great: 280%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
102GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 178 81 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 466
Mixed 411
SusWrite 159
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 47.6
157% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 361
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
583GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 96 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 65.6
Write 38
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 97.2
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
518GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 153 154 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 154
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G PSD48G266681 KHX2666C16/8G 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 29.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC315 PHL 271V8B
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback