Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 698
67% 555 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.5% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 172
Parallax 174
87% 151 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 118
Splatting 81.1
80% 99.9 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 254 243 250 247 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 507
Write 300
Mixed 290
SusWrite 252
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 26
128% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 247
199% 279 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 128%
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
302GB free
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 239 241 240 240 241 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,656
Mixed 634
SusWrite 324
231% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.4
207% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 812
601% 801 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 180%
Great: 226%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
775GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 131 131 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 159
Write 156
Mixed 118
SusWrite 130
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 32.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 18 144 27" 2560 1440 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback