Acer Aspire TC-1760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-1760  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-1760
Memory3.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 175
2-Core 318
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 904
90% 731 Pts
64-Core 1232
76% 1232 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Acer(1025 1572) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 8.7
6% 9.9 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 7.9
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 419 422 428 428 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 1,594
Mixed 1,266
SusWrite 472
264% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.5
189% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 982
651% 762 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 172%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1KC-4 ACR32D4U2S1MF-8 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.3
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 27" 1280 720 ACR09B1 KA272
Typical Aspire TC-1760 Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-1760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback