Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502DU
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 01:14
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 156
55% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 419
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
Asus(1043 18D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.4% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 68.6
58% 73.4 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 63.6
59% 73.7 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 211 286 266 237 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 363
Write 594
Mixed 596
SusWrite 249
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 16.8
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 339
257% 347 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 10% 73 164 15 60 24" 1920 1080 AUS24C2 VG248
Typical Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback