Samsung 730QFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730QFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QFG-KF1BR
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 23:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 20.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 249
62% 129 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 606
58% 481 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D CA06) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.7
13% 17.2 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 0.1
9% 12.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2157 2370 2411 2046 1951 1870 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 1,518
Write 1,626
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 2134
377% 1,666 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 64.4
230% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 1,064
787% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 209%
This bench: 308%
Great: 440%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 48.3
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 13
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 311
13% 311 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 5R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 18% 55 85 32 60 34.1" 1280 720 SAM7119 LC34G55T
Typical 730QFG Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Samsung 730QFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback