MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 84.7
85% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 178
Parallax 181
152% 182 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 156
Splatting 130
127% 159 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 576 668 679 676 665 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,466
Write 1,770
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 633
363% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 85.6
280% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 1,064
801% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 273%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
608GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1902 1717 1634 1625 1533 1481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2,450
Mixed 2328
SusWrite 1,649
506% 2,248 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 95.9
313% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1046
DQ Mixed 1,155
870% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 353%
Great: 435%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 157 158 158 162 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 154
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 153
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
863GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 99 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 98.4
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 40.5
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 37.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 0P 3R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 11% 27 215 57 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
History: Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B | Score 39: 0P 3R 6G 6B
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback