Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:51
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$271
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 958
91% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 87
77% 88.7 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 73.1
67% 83.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1472
Write 1,253
Mixed 1,056
280% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 27.9
149% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 49.2
107% 238 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 141 36 38 46 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 479
Mixed 321
SusWrite 129
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 50.5
168% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 342
260% 352 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96%
Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
165GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 127 141 153 133 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 133
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Portable 2TB
125GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 78 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 79.8
Write 114
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 78.7
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
135% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Portable 4TB
599GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 100 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 64.6
Write 82.3
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 98.2
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.3
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 60% 20 216 58 165 27" 1920 1080 MSI3CA9 MSI G27C5
Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $733
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback