Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:45
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 27.9
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 31.3
18% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 84.8
8-Core 89.3
12% 87.1 Pts
64-Core 90
6% 90 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 287 321 303 248 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 290
Write 310
Mixed 243
SusWrite 276
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 17
59% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 138
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 53%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3190ME76F8F1600 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 33% 12 62 11 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0C20 T24E390
Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback