TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:10
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 179
2-Core 357
110% 207 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1,285
118% 990 Pts
64-Core 1,581
98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
PowerColor(148C 2427) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 269
Parallax 507
207% 343 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 296
Splatting 278
240% 296 fps
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 195%
 Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,399
Write 970
Mixed 990
248% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 74.1
278% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 545
474% 692 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 189%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
17GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 124 124 109 125 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 122
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 113%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
913GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 137 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 160
Write 164
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 135
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 84.6%
 Great: 101%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
4GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 72 85 77 77 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 69
Write 67.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 79.6
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 42.7%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FB CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FB CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 27.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 33.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 80.6%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 24.5" 1280 720 MSI3BA3 MSI MAG251RX
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples851x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples624x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples560x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples382x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples359x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples247x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples133x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples108x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples91x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples244x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples194x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples163x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback