Asus ASUS Vivobook S 16 S5606MA_S5606MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook S 16 S5606MA_S5606MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S5606MA
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 19:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 52.9
1-Core 188
2-Core 370
102% 204 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,025
101% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,424
88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Asus(1043 3758) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 61.6
25% 39.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 50.3
34% 39.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2009 2177 2085 2226 2216 2221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,993
Write 2,057
Mixed 1,856
SusWrite 2,156
507% 2,265 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.8
228% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 688
498% 662 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 351%
Great: 523%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 67.9
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 71.1
185% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 30.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 162%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 16" 1280 720 SDC4178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback