Samsung 730QFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 730QFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QFG-KA4SE
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 14:11
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 48.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 260
72% 142 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 745
79% 630 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D CA06) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 16.9
13% 18.4 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 12.8
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2093 1953 2009 1867 1807 680 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,832
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 1735
372% 1,646 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.5
167% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 947
691% 904 MB/s
Poor: 209%
This bench: 260%
Great: 440%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 46.7
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 70 51 60 13.3" 1280 720 SDC4156
Typical 730QFG Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Samsung 730QFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback