Lenovo F0HH0000US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo F0HH0000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3778
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 13:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 70.9
1-Core 187
2-Core 344
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 1,022
104% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,584
98% 1,584 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3778) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 22.6
15% 22.1 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17.9
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1001 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2076 2234 2246 2181 2166 849 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 3,096
Write 2332
Mixed 1,970
SusWrite 1,959
523% 2,339 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 76.5
275% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 770
551% 722 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 359%
Great: 476%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
163% Outstanding
MC Read 65.2
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 63.6
184% 64.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 53.4
SC Mixed 25.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 163%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 2560 1369 LENE59A LEN-YOGA9-A-B
Typical F0HH0000US Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo F0HH0000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback