Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 12:43
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 785
75% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 62
Parallax 89.6
53% 72.1 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 44.6
48% 60.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 224 184 230 203 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 500
Write 436
Mixed 415
SusWrite 208
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 23.9
122% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 35.3
87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
91GB free
Firmware: FXT21H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 477
Write 134
Mixed 168
SusWrite 136
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 22.8
92% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 59.1
56% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 59%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
182GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 788 705 564 256 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 971
Mixed 896
SusWrite 577
209% 934 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 56.2
183% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 601
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 306
283% 442 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 167%
Great: 236%
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
344GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 279 88 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 114
Write 236
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 124
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 8.5
70% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 9.1
36% 75 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 81%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 187 186 189 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 134
Write 135
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 187
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.7
394% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 31.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 11 75 19" 1280 720 PHLC010 Philips 190X
Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback