Acer Aspire 315-51_z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire 315-51_z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 315-51_z
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 10:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 121
55% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 0949) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.4
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 11.3
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 69 72 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 436
Write 309
Mixed 302
SusWrite 96.9
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 24.6
98% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 177
153% 224 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: AM0P2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 81 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 70.9
Write 68.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 79.8
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Ind-1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical Aspire 315-51_z Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 315-51_z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback