HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 26 days ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83F2
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 09:27
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 711
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
HP(103C 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.91
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 9.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 10
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 187 182 180 174 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 461
Write 412
Mixed 379
SusWrite 184
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 38.8
127% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 347
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 34" 1280 720 HPN3757 HP E34m G4
Typical ProDesk 400 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback