HP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C65
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 09:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 29.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 299
73% 152 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 833
84% 681 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
HP(103C 8C65) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5007
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 8.8
15% 12.9 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 15.8
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-2006 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1018 966 1031 921 1337 1329 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 1,159
Mixed 739
SusWrite 1,100
257% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 39.7
150% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 363
262% 347 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 192%
Great: 423%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 55
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 118%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4197
Typical Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback