Acer Nitro AN715-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN715-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Citigo_CFS
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200409
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 06:40
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 60.8
40% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 130
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1336) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.4% Poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 20.9
14% 23.1 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 49.3
35% 41.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 158 135 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 962
Write 216
Mixed 365
SusWrite 160
93% 426 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 8.5
75% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 111
67% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 153%
KZ1000 1TB
678GB free
Firmware: U1006A5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 352 350 466 563 543 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,183
Write 1,197
Mixed 840
SusWrite 436
205% 914 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 25
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 151
112% 148 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 106%
Great: 254%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: LFM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 98 84 104 100 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 77.1
Write 120
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 96.4
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 0B2C HKED4082CAA1D0SA1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 16 81 2 60 15.5" 1920 1017 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Nitro AN715-51 Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN715-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback