Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20240322
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '24 at 05:53
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 75.6 1-Core 148 2-Core 282 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 957 90% 748 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759 18,552 User benchmarks, average bench 143% XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 88.8 Reflection 87 Parallax 191 72% 122 fps	MRender 151 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 100 85% 106 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 153%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU655 240GB 2,317 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 126 130 79 58 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 416 Write 206 Mixed 258 SusWrite 112 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 30.8 109% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 172 127% 168 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 199 191 163 160 166 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 143 Write 103 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 176 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69% Good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 27.2 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 14.4 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 0P 3R 6G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	51%	45	184	11	180	23.8"	1920 1017	ACR0A33 KG241Y S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	401x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	134x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	52x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16