Asus ROG Strix G15CE_G15CE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive405% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Strix G15CE_G15CE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G15CE
Memory35.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '24 at 03:31
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 318
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 1,001
99% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,577
98% 1,577 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 104
Parallax 146
77% 115 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 108
Splatting 73.7
72% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2910 2709 2953 2989 3022 2982 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 3,164
Write 3,115
Mixed 2,280
SusWrite 2,928
646% 2,872 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.9
195% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 910
673% 891 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 405%
Great: 623%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 433 433 432 432 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1360
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 510
253% 1,128 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 823
613% 817 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 170%
Great: 237%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAD40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 92 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 167
Write 165
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 91
81% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 187 188 185 188 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 147
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 182
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST1000LM015-1EL164 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: SM73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 74 84 82 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 104
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 82.1
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.7
330% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 65%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
586GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 65 65 61 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 78.4
Write 75.4
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 63.8
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4AGU88C-32N220D Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN Limited KD4AGU88C-32N220D Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 33.9
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24A5 VG248
Typical ROG Strix G15CE_G15CE Builds (Compare 3,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Strix G15CE_G15CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback